1. Jozwiak M et al.: Mechanical methods for induction of labor. The Cochrane Library, Issue 3 , 2012
  2. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists /RCOG/:  The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion: Summary. Revised edition published November, 2011
  3. Chambers DG et al.: Comparison of Dilapan-S and laminaria for cervical priming before surgical pregnancy termination at 17-22 weeks’ gestation. International Journal of Women’s Health 2011:3 347-352
  4. Mozurkewich EL et al.: Methods of induction of labor: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2011, 11:84
  5. Wilson LC  et al.: Cervical preparation for surgical abortion between 12 and 18 weeks of gestation using vaginal misoprostol and Dilapan-S. Contraception. 2011 Jun;83(6):511-6. Epub 2010 Dec 3
  6. Roztočil A: Labor Preinduction and Induction – Recommended Steps – Revised, 2010
  7. Kapp N et al.: Cervical preparation for first trimester surgical abortion. The Cochrane Library, 2010
  8. Newmann SJ et al.:  Cervical preparation for second trimester dilation and evacuation. The Cochrane Library, 2010
  9. Drey EA et al.: How Research Guides Clinical Practice: Cervical preparation for surgical abortion from 20 to 24 weeks’ gestation. Reproductive Health, 2010
  10. Binder T.: Is Our Approach to Post Term Pregnancy Correct? Actual Gyn 2009, 1, 30-33,
  11. Samuel MI et al.: Hygroscopic dilator (Dilapan-S) and misoprostol combination for the early first-trimester termination of pregnancy. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2009 Jan;35(1):45-7
  12. Hayes JL et al.: Cervical dilation in second-trimester abortion. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;52(2):171-8
  13. Newmann S et al.: Cervical preparation for surgical abortion from 20 to 24 weeks' gestation. Contraception , Contraception 77 (2008) 308-314
  14. Heinemann J et al.: Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, August 2008, 177-188
  15. Carbonell Esteve JL: SURGICAL METHODS in 2nd TRIMESTER ABORTION. Reproductive Health and Responsibilities, 24/25 October 2008 - Berlin, Germany
  16. Tan EL et al.: Are Hygroscopic Dilators Better than Vaginal Prostaglandins for Induction of Labor? SGH PROCEEDINGS, VOL 17, NO 3,2008
  17. Jansen NJ et al.: Mifepristone and misoprostol versus Dilapan and sulprostone for second trimester termination of pregnancy. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 2008 21(11): 847-851
  18. Carbonell Esteve JL et al.: Late second-trimester abortions induced with mifepristone, misoprostol and oxytocin. Contraception. 2008 Jul;78(1):52-60. Epub 2008 May 21
  19. Chen, FC et al.: Isosorbide mononitrate vaginal gel versus misoprostol vaginal gel versus Dilapan-S for cervical ripening before first trimester curettage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Jun;138(2):176-9. Epub 2007 Nov 5
  20. Fox MC et al.: Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks of gestation. Contraception 76 (2007) 486-495
  21. Allen RH et al.: Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (b14 weeks' gestation). Contraception 76 (2007) 139-156
  22. Roztočil A: Induction of Labor, Gynecologist 2007, vol. 16, no.3, p.102
  23. Poon LC, et al.: Audit of the effectiveness of cervical preparation with Dilapan prior to late second-trimester (20-24 weeks) surgical termination of pregnancy. BJOG. 2007 Apr;114(4):485-8. Epub 2007 Feb 19
  24. Roztočil A: Controversies and Errors in Labor Induction. Modern Gynecology and Obstetrics, 16, 2007, no.1
  25. Roztočil A: RECOMMENDED STEPS IN LABOR PREINDUCTION AND INDUCTION. Czech Gynecology, 64, 1999, no. 5, p. 342-345, Modern Gynecology and Obstetrics, 16, 2007, no. 1, Supplementum A, March
  26. Sanchez-Ramos L: Induction of Labor. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 32 (2005) 181- 200
  27. Hygroscopic cervical dilators: literature review, 2004
  28. Lichtenberg ES: Complications of Osmotic Dilators. OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY,  2004, Volume 59, Number 7
  29. Ruano R et al.: Second- and third-trimester therapeutic terminations of pregnancy in cases with complete placenta previa - does feticide decrease postdelivery maternal hemorrhage? Fetal Diagn Ther. 2004 Nov-Dec;19(6):475-8
  30. Ferreira MSC et al.: Value of the hygroscopic dilator for visualization of the endocervical canal in conization by loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia,vol.26 no.3, Apr. 2004
  31. Serhal P et al.: Cervical dilatation with hygroscopic rods prior to ovarial stimulation facilitates embryo transfer. Human Reproduction Vol.18, No.12 pp. 2618±2620, 2003
  32. Perrotte F et al.: Medical termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: the patient's point of view. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2000 Apr;29(2):185-91
  33. Aeby T et al.: Long-term Retained Hygroscopic Cervical Dilator. Obstet Gynecol_1999, VOL 94, page 855
  34. Roztočil A et al.: Recommended Steps in Labor Preinduction and Induction, Czech Gynecology, 64, 1999, no. 5, p. 342-345, Modern Gynecology and Obstetrics, 16, 2007, no. 1, Supplementum A, March
  35. Usta IM et al.: Long-term complications and ultrasound findings in retained Dilapan fragments. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 65  1999. 311-312
  36. Roztočil A et al.: Comparison of 3 pre-induction Cervical Priming Methods: PGE2 gel vs. Dilapan S vs. estradiol gel). Czech Gynecology, 63, 1998, no. 1, p. 3-9
  37. Hibbard JU et al.: Cervical Ripening With Prostaglandin Gel and Hygroscopic Dilators. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology 6:18-24 (1998)
  38. Robinson G: A Comparative Study of Dilapan S and Laminaria for preparation of cervix prior to section preparation of pregnancy: preliminary report, 1997
  39. Gilson GJ et al.: A prospective randomized evaluation of a hygroscopic cervical dilator, Dilapan, in the pre-induction ripening of patients undergoing induction of labor. American journal of Obsterics and gynecology, July 1996, Vol 175, No 1, 145-9
  40. Patsner B: Same Day Dilapan Insertion Before 2nd trimester dilatation and evacuation for fetal anomaly or death. Journal of Reproductive Medicine,1996, 41,71-2
  41. Roztočil A et al.: Pre-induction cervical priming in patients with hypertesion and renal diseases by means of hygroscopic rods (Dilapan). Increasingly Safe and Successfull pregnancies, 1996, excerpta medica
  42. Krammer J et al.: Pre-Induction cervical ripening: randomized comparison of two methods. Obstetric and gynecology,Vol 85; No4; 614-8; 1995
  43. McCord M et al.: Synthetic Hygroscopic Dilator Use in patient with unsatisfactory Colposcopy. Journal of Obstetrics and  Gynecology, 1995, Vol 85, 30-2
  44. Roztočil A et al.: Dilation of the Cervical Canal by Dilapan before Induced Abortion in the 1st Trimester of Pregnancy in Primagravids. Czech Gynecology, 60, 1995, no. 1, p. 14-16
  45. Roztočil A et al.: Indukce zrání čípku hydrofilními tyčinkami Dilapan u termínové gravidity (Induction of maturation of  the protion utrei with hydrophil Dilapan rods in pregnancies in term). Česká gynekologie, 60, 1995, č. 2, s 80-83
  46. Roztočil A et al.: Tactics of Delivery Supervision in Diabetics. Czech Gynecology, 60, 1995, no. 2, p. 90-92
  47. Hern WM: Laminaria vs Dilapan  osmotic cervical dilators for outpatient dilators and evacuation abortion; Randomized cohort comparison of 1001 patients. American journal of Obsterics and gynecology,1994; 171: 1324-8
  48. Roztočil A et al.: Dilapan cervical dilatation prior to the Ist trimestr of pregnancy termination in primigravids. Scripta medica(Brno) Tom 67,Fasc 8.,329-334, Dec 1994
  49. Roztočil A et al.: Preinduction and Induction of Labor, Current State. Scientific conference of SGPA and ČGPA, Bratislava, 1994
  50. Haskell M: Dilation and Extraction for Late Second Trimester Abortion. National Abortion Federation Risk Management Seminar, 1992
  51. Blumenthal PD et al.: Randomized trial of Dilapan and Laminaria as Cervical Rippening Agents before Induction of Labor. Obstet gynecol vol 75; No3; 365, 1990
  52. Stern JL et al.: Preventing cervical conization by achieving satisfactory colposcopy with hygroscopic cervical dilators. AM J OBSTET GYNECOL 1990;163:176-7
  53. Golland IM et al.: A comparison of osmotic dilators, Lamicel and Dilapan, and a prostaglandin E, analogue, gemeprost, for ripening the cervix before legal abortion. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (1989) 9. 21 0-21 2
  54. Wells EC et al.: Cervical dilation: comparison of  Lamicel and Dilapan. American journal of Obsterics and gynecology,1989; 161: 1124-6
  55. Luerti M et al.: SLOW CERVICAL DILATATION IN VOLUNTARY ABORTIONS DURING THE FIRST TRIMESTER: COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS. Rivista di ostetricia ginecologia practica e medicina perinatale,Vol. IV, No 1, Jan-March, 1989
  56. Bokström H et al.: Preoperative Dilatation of Cervix at Legal Abortion with syntethic, fast-swelling hygroscopic tents. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 68, 1989
  57. Phipps J et al.: Preoperative Gemeprost Pessaries Compared to Dilapan Primigravid 1st Trimestr legal abortion. Journal of Obstetrics and  Gynecology, ,Vol 9, No4, 1989
  58. Confalonieri C et al.: A new alternative hygroscopic dilatation of the cervix. Rivista di ostetricia ginecologia practica e medicina perinatale, Vol III, No 1, Jan-March, 1988
  59. Golsis F et al.: Use of hygroscopic dilators in colposcopy. Rivista di ostetricia ginecologia practica e medicina perinatale, Vol III, No 1, Jan-March, 1988
  60. Blumenthal PD: Prospective Comparison Dilapan vs Laminaria Pretreatment of cervix in 2nd Trimestr induction abortion. Journal of Obsterics and  Gynecology, 1988 ,Vol 72, No2,243

Ask your doctor about Dilapan-S®

Interested in Dilapan-S®? Download a leaflet with product information and show it to your doctor!