Important safety info
Go to patient site

Bibliography

  1. Jozwiak M et al.: Mechanical methods for induction of labor. The Cochrane Library, Issue 3 , 2012
  2. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists /RCOG/:  The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion: Summary. Revised edition published November, 2011
  3. Chambers DG et al.: Comparison of Dilapan-S and laminaria for cervical priming before surgical pregnancy termination at 17-22 weeks’ gestation. International Journal of Women’s Health 2011:3 347-352
  4. Mozurkewich EL et al.: Methods of induction of labor: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2011, 11:84
  5. Wilson LC  et al.: Cervical preparation for surgical abortion between 12 and 18 weeks of gestation using vaginal misoprostol and Dilapan-S. Contraception. 2011 Jun;83(6):511-6. Epub 2010 Dec 3
  6. Roztočil A: Labor Preinduction and Induction – Recommended Steps – Revised, 2010
  7. Kapp N et al.: Cervical preparation for first trimester surgical abortion. The Cochrane Library, 2010 www.thecochranelibrary.com
  8. Newmann SJ et al.:  Cervical preparation for second trimester dilation and evacuation. The Cochrane Library, 2010 www.thecochranelibrary.com
  9. Drey EA et al.: How Research Guides Clinical Practice: Cervical preparation for surgical abortion from 20 to 24 weeks’ gestation. Reproductive Health, 2010
  10. Binder T.: Is Our Approach to Post Term Pregnancy Correct? Actual Gyn 2009, 1, 30-33, www.actualgyn.com
  11. Samuel MI et al.: Hygroscopic dilator (Dilapan-S) and misoprostol combination for the early first-trimester termination of pregnancy. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2009 Jan;35(1):45-7
  12. Hayes JL et al.: Cervical dilation in second-trimester abortion. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;52(2):171-8
  13. Newmann S et al.: Cervical preparation for surgical abortion from 20 to 24 weeks' gestation. Contraception , Contraception 77 (2008) 308-314
  14. Heinemann J et al.: Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, August 2008, 177-188
  15. Carbonell Esteve JL: SURGICAL METHODS in 2nd TRIMESTER ABORTION. Reproductive Health and Responsibilities, 24/25 October 2008 - Berlin, Germany
  16. Tan EL et al.: Are Hygroscopic Dilators Better than Vaginal Prostaglandins for Induction of Labor? SGH PROCEEDINGS, VOL 17, NO 3,2008
  17. Jansen NJ et al.: Mifepristone and misoprostol versus Dilapan and sulprostone for second trimester termination of pregnancy. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 2008 21(11): 847-851
  18. Carbonell Esteve JL et al.: Late second-trimester abortions induced with mifepristone, misoprostol and oxytocin. Contraception. 2008 Jul;78(1):52-60. Epub 2008 May 21
  19. Chen, FC et al.: Isosorbide mononitrate vaginal gel versus misoprostol vaginal gel versus Dilapan-S for cervical ripening before first trimester curettage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Jun;138(2):176-9. Epub 2007 Nov 5
  20. Fox MC et al.: Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks of gestation. Contraception 76 (2007) 486-495
  21. Allen RH et al.: Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (b14 weeks' gestation). Contraception 76 (2007) 139-156
  22. Roztočil A: Induction of Labor, Gynecologist 2007, vol. 16, no.3, p.102
  23. Poon LC, et al.: Audit of the effectiveness of cervical preparation with Dilapan prior to late second-trimester (20-24 weeks) surgical termination of pregnancy. BJOG. 2007 Apr;114(4):485-8. Epub 2007 Feb 19
  24. Roztočil A: Controversies and Errors in Labor Induction. Modern Gynecology and Obstetrics, 16, 2007, no.1
  25. Roztočil A: RECOMMENDED STEPS IN LABOR PREINDUCTION AND INDUCTION. Czech Gynecology, 64, 1999, no. 5, p. 342-345, Modern Gynecology and Obstetrics, 16, 2007, no. 1, Supplementum A, March
  26. Sanchez-Ramos L: Induction of Labor. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 32 (2005) 181- 200
  27. Hygroscopic cervical dilators: literature review, 2004
  28. Lichtenberg ES: Complications of Osmotic Dilators. OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY,  2004, Volume 59, Number 7
  29. Ruano R et al.: Second- and third-trimester therapeutic terminations of pregnancy in cases with complete placenta previa - does feticide decrease postdelivery maternal hemorrhage? Fetal Diagn Ther. 2004 Nov-Dec;19(6):475-8
  30. Ferreira MSC et al.: Value of the hygroscopic dilator for visualization of the endocervical canal in conization by loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia,vol.26 no.3, Apr. 2004
  31. Serhal P et al.: Cervical dilatation with hygroscopic rods prior to ovarial stimulation facilitates embryo transfer. Human Reproduction Vol.18, No.12 pp. 2618±2620, 2003
  32. Perrotte F et al.: Medical termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: the patient's point of view. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2000 Apr;29(2):185-91
  33. Aeby T et al.: Long-term Retained Hygroscopic Cervical Dilator. Obstet Gynecol_1999, VOL 94, page 855
  34. Roztočil A et al.: Recommended Steps in Labor Preinduction and Induction, Czech Gynecology, 64, 1999, no. 5, p. 342-345, Modern Gynecology and Obstetrics, 16, 2007, no. 1, Supplementum A, March
  35. Usta IM et al.: Long-term complications and ultrasound findings in retained Dilapan fragments. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 65  1999. 311-312
  36. Roztočil A et al.: Comparison of 3 pre-induction Cervical Priming Methods: PGE2 gel vs. Dilapan S vs. estradiol gel). Czech Gynecology, 63, 1998, no. 1, p. 3-9
  37. Hibbard JU et al.: Cervical Ripening With Prostaglandin Gel and Hygroscopic Dilators. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology 6:18-24 (1998)
  38. Robinson G: A Comparative Study of Dilapan S and Laminaria for preparation of cervix prior to section preparation of pregnancy: preliminary report, 1997
  39. Gilson GJ et al.: A prospective randomized evaluation of a hygroscopic cervical dilator, Dilapan, in the pre-induction ripening of patients undergoing induction of labor. American journal of Obsterics and gynecology, July 1996, Vol 175, No 1, 145-9
  40. Patsner B: Same Day Dilapan Insertion Before 2nd trimester dilatation and evacuation for fetal anomaly or death. Journal of Reproductive Medicine,1996, 41,71-2
  41. Roztočil A et al.: Pre-induction cervical priming in patients with hypertesion and renal diseases by means of hygroscopic rods (Dilapan). Increasingly Safe and Successfull pregnancies, 1996, excerpta medica
  42. Krammer J et al.: Pre-Induction cervical ripening: randomized comparison of two methods. Obstetric and gynecology,Vol 85; No4; 614-8; 1995
  43. McCord M et al.: Synthetic Hygroscopic Dilator Use in patient with unsatisfactory Colposcopy. Journal of Obstetrics and  Gynecology, 1995, Vol 85, 30-2
  44. Roztočil A et al.: Dilation of the Cervical Canal by Dilapan before Induced Abortion in the 1st Trimester of Pregnancy in Primagravids. Czech Gynecology, 60, 1995, no. 1, p. 14-16
  45. Roztočil A et al.: Indukce zrání čípku hydrofilními tyčinkami Dilapan u termínové gravidity (Induction of maturation of  the protion utrei with hydrophil Dilapan rods in pregnancies in term). Česká gynekologie, 60, 1995, č. 2, s 80-83
  46. Roztočil A et al.: Tactics of Delivery Supervision in Diabetics. Czech Gynecology, 60, 1995, no. 2, p. 90-92
  47. Hern WM: Laminaria vs Dilapan  osmotic cervical dilators for outpatient dilators and evacuation abortion; Randomized cohort comparison of 1001 patients. American journal of Obsterics and gynecology,1994; 171: 1324-8
  48. Roztočil A et al.: Dilapan cervical dilatation prior to the Ist trimestr of pregnancy termination in primigravids. Scripta medica(Brno) Tom 67,Fasc 8.,329-334, Dec 1994
  49. Roztočil A et al.: Preinduction and Induction of Labor, Current State. Scientific conference of SGPA and ČGPA, Bratislava, 1994
  50. Haskell M: Dilation and Extraction for Late Second Trimester Abortion. National Abortion Federation Risk Management Seminar, 1992
  51. Blumenthal PD et al.: Randomized trial of Dilapan and Laminaria as Cervical Rippening Agents before Induction of Labor. Obstet gynecol vol 75; No3; 365, 1990
  52. Stern JL et al.: Preventing cervical conization by achieving satisfactory colposcopy with hygroscopic cervical dilators. AM J OBSTET GYNECOL 1990;163:176-7
  53. Golland IM et al.: A comparison of osmotic dilators, Lamicel and Dilapan, and a prostaglandin E, analogue, gemeprost, for ripening the cervix before legal abortion. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (1989) 9. 21 0-21 2
  54. Wells EC et al.: Cervical dilation: comparison of  Lamicel and Dilapan. American journal of Obsterics and gynecology,1989; 161: 1124-6
  55. Luerti M et al.: SLOW CERVICAL DILATATION IN VOLUNTARY ABORTIONS DURING THE FIRST TRIMESTER: COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS. Rivista di ostetricia ginecologia practica e medicina perinatale,Vol. IV, No 1, Jan-March, 1989
  56. Bokström H et al.: Preoperative Dilatation of Cervix at Legal Abortion with syntethic, fast-swelling hygroscopic tents. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 68, 1989
  57. Phipps J et al.: Preoperative Gemeprost Pessaries Compared to Dilapan Primigravid 1st Trimestr legal abortion. Journal of Obstetrics and  Gynecology, ,Vol 9, No4, 1989
  58. Confalonieri C et al.: A new alternative hygroscopic dilatation of the cervix. Rivista di ostetricia ginecologia practica e medicina perinatale, Vol III, No 1, Jan-March, 1988
  59. Golsis F et al.: Use of hygroscopic dilators in colposcopy. Rivista di ostetricia ginecologia practica e medicina perinatale, Vol III, No 1, Jan-March, 1988
  60. Blumenthal PD: Prospective Comparison Dilapan vs Laminaria Pretreatment of cervix in 2nd Trimestr induction abortion. Journal of Obsterics and  Gynecology, 1988 ,Vol 72, No2,243

Brochure for clinicians

To answer your common questions, please download a brochure specially made for clinicans.

DOWNLOAD A PRODUCT BROCHURE