US website


Bibliography and sources

  1.  Instruction for use: DSPIen – RevG 09_2019_03
  2. Inducing labour: NICE guideline [NG207], November 2021
  3. Saad AF, et al. Outpatient compared with inpatient preinduction cervical ripening using a synthetic osmotic dilator. A randomized clinical trial. ObstetGynecol. 2022 Oct; 140(4):584-590. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004942
  4. Avritscher EBC, et al. Economic evaluation of outpatient vs inpatient cervical ripening using Dilapan-S prior to induction of labor. Poster presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol, Vol 228, Issue 1, Supplement, S 631, 2023 Jan
  5. Walker KF, Zaher S, et al. Synthetic osmotic dilators (Dilapan-S) or dinoprostone vaginal insert (Propess) for inpatient induction of labour: A UK cost-consequence model. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2022 Sept;
  6. Kumer J, et al. Cervical ripening as an outpatient procedure in the pandemic – minimising the inpatient days and lowering the socioeconomic costs. J. Perinat. Med. 2022; aop
  7. Gupta JK, Maher A, Stubbs C, et al. A randomized trial of synthetic osmotic cervical dilator for induction of labor vs dinoprostone vaginal insert. Am J. Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022;4:100628.
  8. Gavara R, Saad AF, Wapner RJ, et al. Cervical Ripening Efficacy of Synthetic Osmotic Cervical Dilator Compared With Oral Misoprostol at Term: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2022;139(6):1083-1091. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000004799.
  9. Saad AF, Villarreal J, Eid J, et al. A randomized controlled trial of Dilapan-S vs Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening (DILAFOL trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;220:275.e1-9.
  10. Gupta JK et al. Synthetic osmotic dilators in the induction of labour – An international multicentre observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2018 Oct;229:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 3
  11. Koenigbauer JT, Schalinski E, Jarchau U, et al. Cervical ripening after cesarean section: a prospective dual center study comparing a mechanical osmotic dilator vs. prostaglandin E2. J. Perinat. Med. 2021.
  12. Hruban L, Janku P, Gerychova R, et al. Mechanical pre-induction in women with premature rupture of membranes; Correspondence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2020 Feb; 247:265- 266.
  13. Drunecky T et al. Experimental comparison of properties of natural and synthetic osmotic dilators, Arch Gynecol Obstet 292, 349–354 (2015)
  14. Lawrence. A et al.: Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 8. Art. No.: CD003934.
  15. European market survey, Creative Medical Research, data on file, 2021